A High-quality Oxford Nanopore Assembly of the Hourglass Dolphin ( <i>Lagenorhynchus cruciger</i> ) Genome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The hourglass dolphin ( Lagenorhynchus cruciger ) is a small cetacean species of the Southern Ocean, with significance to iwi Māori ( Māori tribes ) of Aotearoa New Zealand as taonga ( treasured/valued ). Due to the remoteness and difficulty of surveying Antarctic waters, it remains one of the least-studied dolphin species. A recent stranding of an hourglass dolphin represented a rare opportunity to generate a genome assembly as a resource for future study into the conservation and evolutionary biology of this species. In this study, we present a high-quality genome assembly of an hourglass dolphin individual using a single sequencing platform, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, coupled with computationally efficient assembly methods. Our assembly strategy yielded a genome of high contiguity (N50 of 8.07 Mbp) and quality (98.3% BUSCO completeness). Compared to other Delphinoidea reference genomes, this assembly has fewer missing BUSCOs than any except Orcinus orca , more single-copy complete BUSCOs than any except Phocoena sinus , and 20% fewer duplicated BUSCOs than the average Delphinoidea reference genome. This suggests that it is one of the most complete and accurate marine mammal genomes to date. This study showcases the feasibility of a cost-effective mammalian genome assembly method, allowing for genomic data generation outside the traditional confines of academia and/or resource-rich genome assembly hubs, and facilitating the ability to uphold Indigenous data sovereignty. In the future the genome assembly presented here will allow valuable insights into the past population size changes, adaptation, vulnerability to future climate change of the hourglass dolphin and related species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".