MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399602197 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.153109

Alkaline subcritical water extraction of bioactive compounds and antioxidants from beach-cast brown algae (Ascophyllum Nodosum)

2024· article· en· W4399602197 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Zhang, Kelly Hawboldt, Stephanie MacQuarrie, Raymond Thomas, Teklab Gebregiworgis

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityCape Breton UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAscophyllumBrown algaeBrown seaweedExtraction (chemistry)AlgaeGreen algaeBotanyChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beach-cast brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum (rockweed) is a seasonal phenomenon where rockweed accumulates on beaches, resulting in environmental impacts. However, rockweed is a valuable source of bioactive compounds and nutrients for use in biomaterials, food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. This study explores the utilization of alkaline subcritical water extraction in an accelerated solvent extractor (ASE) for extracting valuable compounds from beach-cast rockweed. The bioactive compounds and nutrients (alginate, fucoidan, phenolics, minerals, and vitamins) were first characterized. The yields of major components (alginate, fucoidan, and phenolics) and antioxidant properties of crude extract were further optimized in the ASE system as a function of extraction conditions (temperature, extraction time, and solid mass). The maximum yields of crude extract (86.52 dry wt%), alginate (38.25 dry wt%), and fucoidan (39.38 dry wt%) were achieved at 160 °C, 18 min, and 0.1 g mass loading. A higher temperature of 200 °C increased phenolic yield and antioxidant activities (ABTS and FRAP assays) but led to alginate/fucoidan degradation. The extraction rates for extract, alginate, and fucoidan were modeled using Fick’s and Peleg’s models. Both models fit the experimental data well, but Fick’s model showed a better overall fit. The effective diffusion coefficients for the extract (7.82 × 10−12 m2/s), fucoidan (7.56 × 10−12 m2/s), and alginate (8.55 × 10−12 m2/s) were determined. Thus, the ASE using alkaline subcritical water can effectively be used to identify and quantify key value-added compounds by modifying process conditions while minimizing extraction time (maximizing rate) from beach-cast rockweed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering JournalSame topicAlgal biology and biofuel productionFrench-language works237,207