The limit to evolutionary rescue depends on ploidy in yeast exposed to nystatin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of copies of each chromosome, or ploidy, of an organism is a major genomic factor affecting adaptation. We set out to determine how ploidy can impact the outcome of evolution, as well as the likelihood of evolutionary rescue, using short-term experiments with yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in a high concentration of the fungicide nystatin. In similar experiments using haploid yeast, the genetic changes underlying evolutionary rescue were highly repeatable, with all rescued lines containing a single mutation in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway. All of these beneficial mutations were recessive, which led to the expectation that diploids would find alternative genetic routes to adaptation. To test this, we repeated the experiment using both haploid and diploid strains and found that diploid populations did not evolve resistance. Although diploids are able to adapt at the same rate as haploids to a lower, not fully inhibitory, concentration of nystatin, the present study suggests that diploids are limited in their ability to adapt to an inhibitory concentration of nystatin, while haploids may undergo evolutionary rescue. These results demonstrate that ploidy can tip the balance between adaptation and extinction when organisms face an extreme environmental change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".