MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399787342 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae064.295

HGG-11. TRANS-SPECIES STUDY OF IDH-MUTANT REPLICATION-REPAIR DEFICIENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS (RRD-HGG) AND RESPONSE TO COMBINED TARGETED AND IMMUNOTHERAPY: AN IRRDC STUDY

2024· article· en· W4399787342 on OpenAlexaff
Anirban Das, Nicholas R. Fernandez, Kevin Bielamowicz, Gadi Abebe‐Campino, Shani Caspi, Nyman Per, Richard Graham, John Y Kim, Mari Wilhelmsson, Mette Jorgensen, Orli Michaeli, Maria Baro Fernández, Amanda Li, Adrian Levine, Zoya Aamir, Lucie Stengs, Logine Negm, Vanessa Bianchi, Melissa Edwards, Julie Bennett, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, Peter B. Dirks, Éric Bouffet, Cynthia Hawkins, Uri Tabori

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutantImmunotherapyReplication (statistics)Cancer researchBiologyVirologyGeneticsGeneImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND IDH-mutant gliomas comprise <10% of HGG in children. RRD-HGG comprise 5-10% of childhood HGG, demonstrate high mutation burden (TMB) and respond to immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI). The impact of RRD with childhood IDH-mutant gliomas, and effective therapeutic options for these patients are not well-established. METHODS Clinical and multi-omic analyses were performed on IDHmut-RRD-HGG registered to the IRRDC and the glioma taskforce. Tumor development and genomic data were studied from a novel IDHmut-RRD-HGG immunocompetent mouse model. Outcome following ICI and targeted therapy were evaluated. RESULTS IDH mut-RRD-HGG accounted for >60% of childhood IDH-mutant-HGG. Conversely, IDH1-mutations were detected in 20% of RRD-HGG. All patients (n=48) harboured germline mutations in MMR genes (CMMRD: 62%, Lynch syndrome: 38%). Contrary to sporadic IDH-mutant-gliomas, the majority (>90%) were high-grade. Diffuse/multifocal involvement, predominantly involving the frontal lobe, was frequent. TMB was lower than IDH-wildtype RRD-HGG (median: 28 mutations/Mb, p<0.05). Secondary POLE/POLD1 mutations were absent. TP53 and ATRX were frequent somatic hits. Copy number changes, particularly loss of CDKN2A/2B, were common. CD8-T-cell infiltration (immunohistochemistry) and tumor inflammation score (transcriptome) were lower than IDH-wildtype RRD-HGG (p<0.05). A novel mouse model (Olig2Cre+/Msh2LoxP/LSL-Idh1R132H) revealed similar lower TMB, diffuse cerebral involvement, slower growth, and low immune infiltrates as compared with IDH-wildtype RRD-HGG models. IDHmut-RRD-HGG demonstrated worse survival as compared to sporadic IDH-mutant-HGG (p<0.001). Within RRD-HGG, ICI monotherapy resulted in inferior survival in IDHmut-RRD-HGG vs IDH-wildtype RRD-HGG (p<0.05). Five patients developed metachronous IDHmut-RRD-HGG while on anti-PD1 treatment for IDH-wildtype RRD-HGG, suggesting intrinsic resistance. Interestingly, an IDH-inhibitor demonstrated objective response in 4/8 IDHmut-RRD-HGG. Furthermore, for IDHmut-RRD-HGG on ICI treatment, the addition of an IDH-inhibitor prolonged survival at 12-months in comparison to those without (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Hypermutant RRD-HGG with IDH1;p.R132H harbour unique immuno-biology and do not respond to anti-PD1 monotherapy. The addition of IDH-inhibition demonstrated favourable responses, supporting need for evaluation of the combination in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207