RETRACTED: Redefining the Role of Structures to Change Sectoral Resources Governance Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Management
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
This article offers a new perspective on public management for sectoral governance. It explains how the role of structures has evolved and redefined, and how this evolution has created new ways of public action. The research method used is developmental content analysis with a focus on qualitative study. This process involves transcribing qualitative data, developing an analytical framework, coding the collected information and analyzing it. The framework ensures consistent analysis of the evolution and redefinition of structures related to sectorial management. The analysis reveals the diversification of practices and the implementation of new modes of public management. In addition to more decentralized management, the involvement of regional county municipalities allows the implementation of management-oriented projects. The analysis demonstrates that reconciling the demands of sectorial management with the socioeconomic reality of the regions is not always easy and that there are still many obstacles in the path of establishing and maintaining innovative sectorial management practices. This article identifies the obstacles to sectoral management, including a cumbersome regulatory framework, low levels of government support for the regional county municipalities, a lack of human and material resources, and a low level of public interest. It also provides references for the evolution of sectorial management in other regions of the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Vision The Journal of Business Perspective
- Topic
- Local Economic Development and Planning
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- University of OttawaInstitute on Governance
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Corporate governanceDiversification (marketing strategy)BusinessGovernment (linguistics)Qualitative propertyKnowledge managementPublic sectorProcess managementRegional sciencePolitical scienceSociologyMarketingComputer science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes