MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400105048 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.3c01234

Discovery of the Lipopeptides Albubactins A–H from <i>Streptomyces albidoflavus</i> RKJM0023 via Chemical Elicitation with Rhamnolipids and Synthesis of Albubactin A

2024· article· en· W4400105048 on OpenAlexafffund
Zacharie A. Maw, Alyssa L. Grunwald, Bradley Haltli, Christopher Cartmell, Russell G. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsNautilus Biosciences (Canada)University of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationFondation Jean-Louis Lévesque
KeywordsStreptomycetaceaeStreptomycesChemical synthesisChemistryActinomycetalesStereochemistryOrganic chemistryBacteriaBiochemistryMicrobiologyCombinatorial chemistryBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The marine tunicate-derived Streptomyces albidoflavus RKJM0023 was cultured in the presence of a rhamnolipid mixture in an effort to elicit the production of silent natural products. MS/MS-based molecular networking analysis enhanced with nonparametric statistics highlighted the upregulation of a molecular cluster (Kruskal–Wallis p = 1.6 e –6 for 1 ) in which no MS/MS features had library matches. Targeted isolation of these features resulted in the discovery of nine new N- acylated lipopeptides, albubactins A–H ( 1 – 8 ) each containing a unique glutamine tripeptide and a C -terminal ethyl ester moiety. Three related albubactin acids A–C ( 9 – 11 ) lacking the ethyl ester were also identified. NMR spectroscopy and UPLC-HR-ESI-MS/MS demonstrated that the albubactins were obtained as mixtures that shared a common m / z and differed only in their acylated terminal groups. Due to the complex spectroscopic elucidation with many overlapping shifts, a total synthesis of albubactin A ( 1 ) was completed and used to determine the absolute configuration of the new albubactins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207