MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400190320 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00665

Discovery of BI-9508, a Brain-Penetrant GPR88-Receptor-Agonist Tool Compound for <i>In Vivo</i> Mouse Studies

2024· article· en· W4400190320 on OpenAlexaff
M.K.-H. Scha ̈fer, Camille Amalric, Roberto Arban, Luc Baron, Sami Ben Hamida, Petra Breh-Schlanser, Yunhai Cui, Emmanuel Darcq, Christian Eickmeier, Vincent Faye, Christel Franchet, Mélanie Frauli, Célia Halter, Marjorie Heyer, Christoph Hoenke, S. Hoerer, Oliver Hucke, Christophe Joseph, Brigitte L. Kieffer, Louison Lebrun, Stanislas Mayer, Azar Omrani, Mandy Recolet, Laurent Schaeffer, Stéphan Schann, Annette Schlecker, Edith Steinberg, Mélanie Viloria, Klaus Würstle, Kyle Young, Alexander Zinser, Florian Montel, Julian Klepp

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPenetrant (biochemical)Allosteric regulationPharmacologyIn vivoAgonistReceptorOrphan receptorBiochemistryGeneticsMedicineGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decreased activity and expression of the G-protein coupled receptor GPR88 is linked to many behavior-linked neurological disorders. Published preclinical GPR88 allosteric agonists all have in vivo pharmacokinetic properties that preclude their progression to the clinic, including high lipophilicity and poor brain penetration. Here, we describe our attempts to improve GPR88 agonists’ drug-like properties and our analysis of the trade-offs required to successfully target GPR88’s allosteric pocket. We discovered two new GPR88 agonists: One that reduced morphine-induced locomotor activity in a murine proof-of-concept study, and the atropoisomeric BI-9508, which is a brain penetrant and has improved pharmacokinetic properties and dosing that recommend it for future in vivo studies in rodents. BI-9508 still suffers from high lipophilicity, and research on this series was halted. Because of its utility as a tool compound, we now offer researchers access to BI-9508 and a negative control free of charge via Boehringer Ingelheim’s open innovation portal opnMe.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207