Metagenomic profiling of nasopharyngeal samples from adults with acute respiratory infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is challenging due to the broad diversity of potential microbial causes. We used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to analyze the nasopharyngeal virome of ARI patients, who had undergone testing with a clinical multiplex PCR panel (Amplisens ARVI-screen-FRT). We collected nasopharyngeal swabs from 49 outpatient adults, 32 of whom had ARI symptoms and were PCR-positive, and 4 asymptomatic controls in Kazakhstan during Spring 2021. We assessed the biodiversity of the mNGS-derived virome and concordance with PCR results. PCR identified common ARI viruses in 65% of the symptomatic cases. mNGS revealed viral taxa consisting of human, non-human eukaryotic and bacteriophage groups, comprising 15, 11 and 28 genera, respectively. Notable ARI-associated human viruses included rhinovirus (16.3%), betaherpesvirus 7 (14.3%) and Epstein-Barr virus (8.16%). The primary phage hosts were Streptococcus spp. (32.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24.5%) and Burkholderia spp. (20.4%). In total, 47% of ARIs were linked solely to bacterial pathogens, a third to viral-bacterial co-infections, and less than 10% to only viral infections by mNGS. PCR showed low concordance with mNGS, except for rhinovirus. These results underscore the importance of broad diagnostic methods and question the effectiveness of commonly used PCR panels in ARI diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".