Hepatic Gene Expression and Metabolite Profiles of Androstenone and Skatole Relative to Plasma Estrone Sulfate Levels in Boars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testicular steroids can alter the activity and expression of enzymes within the liver and may influence the metabolism of skatole and androstenone, which are responsible for boar taint. Plasma levels of estrone sulfate (E1S) are indicative of the steroidogenic capacity of the boar and are variable between animals of similar live weights at slaughter. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between steroidogenic capacity and the metabolism of boar taint compounds by relating plasma E1S levels at slaughter weight to the expression levels of genes regulating the metabolism of androstenone and skatole, along with their respective metabolite profiles. RT-qPCR was used to evaluate gene expression in the liver. Hepatocytes were also isolated and treated with androstenone or skatole, with metabolite levels in the incubation media quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma E1S levels ranged from 2.2–108.5 ng/mL and were positively correlated with overall skatole metabolism (p = 0.038), the production of metabolites 3-methyloxindole (p = 0.026) and 3-hydroxy-3-methyloxindole (p = 0.036), and expression levels of key genes involved in skatole metabolism, specifically CYP2C33 (p = 0.0042), CYP2C49 (p = 0.022), and CYB5R1 (p = 0.017). There was no association between androstenone metabolism and plasma E1S concentrations; however, there was evidence of possible co-regulation amongst genes involved in the metabolism of androstenone, skatole, and estrogens. These findings indicate that steroidogenic capacity is related to the rate of skatole, but not androstenone metabolism, in slaughter-weight boars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".