How Do Quantitative Videofluoroscopy Measures Differ Between People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Age-Matched Healthy Adults?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Dysphagia is a leading cause of morbidity in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PwALS). Previous videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) in PwALS do not account for the influence of senescence. We aimed to compare swallowing in PwALS and an age- and sex-matched control group using healthy reference data to define typical and atypical values. Method: We conducted retrospective analysis of VFSS data from 19 PwALS (10 male, M age = 63 years, range: 47–82) compared to control data from a cohort of healthy adults. Participants swallowed 20% w/v liquid barium from thin to extremely thick consistency. Blinded duplicate VFSS analysis using the ASPEKT (Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing) method yielded descriptive statistics for 16 quantitative VFSS parameters by consistency. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to identify significant cohort differences. Additionally, the frequencies of atypical values (in the 25% tails of the reference distribution) were tabulated by cohort and compared using odds ratios. Results: PwALS showed increased frequencies of multiple swallows per bolus, incomplete laryngeal vestibule closure, and reduced hyoid speed across consistencies. By contrast, similar frequencies of atypical values for pharyngeal constriction and residue in both cohorts suggest that age-related changes may contribute to the presence of these features in PwALS. Conclusions: This analysis builds on previous descriptions of swallowing pathophysiology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by clarifying the extent to which aging may account for some of the atypical findings seen in this patient population. Longitudinal studies are recommended to further differentiate the effects of ALS from age-related changes in swallowing over the course of disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".