Anti-Ku + myositis: an acquired inflammatory protein-aggregate myopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myositis with anti-Ku-autoantibodies is a rare inflammatory myopathy associated with various connective tissue diseases. Histopathological studies have identified inflammatory and necrotizing aspects, but a precise morphological analysis and pathomechanistic disease model are lacking. We therefore aimed to carry out an in-depth morpho-molecular analysis to uncover possible pathomechanisms. Muscle biopsy specimens from 26 patients with anti-Ku-antibodies and unequivocal myositis were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, transcriptomics, and proteomics and compared to biopsy specimens of non-disease controls, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Clinical findings and laboratory parameters were evaluated retrospectively and correlated with morphological and molecular features. Patients were mainly female (92%) with a median age of 56.5 years. Isolated myositis and overlap with systemic sclerosis were reported in 31%, respectively. Isolated myositis presented with higher creatine kinase levels and cardiac involvement (83%), whereas systemic sclerosis-overlap patients often had interstitial lung disease (57%). Histopathology showed a wide spectrum from mild to pronounced myositis with diffuse sarcolemmal MHC-class I (100%) and -II (69%) immunoreactivity, myofiber necrosis (88%), endomysial inflammation (85%), thickened capillaries (84%), and vacuoles (60%). Conspicuous sarcoplasmic protein aggregates were p62, BAG3, myotilin, or immunoproteasomal beta5i-positive. Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis identified prominent up-regulation of autophagy, proteasome, and hnRNP-related cell stress. To conclude, Ku + myositis is morphologically characterized by myofiber necrosis, MHC-class I and II positivity, variable endomysial inflammation, and distinct protein aggregation varying from IBM and IMNM, and it can be placed in the spectrum of scleromyositis and overlap myositis. It features characteristic sarcoplasmic protein aggregation on an acquired basis being functionally associated with altered chaperone, proteasome, and autophagy function indicating that Ku + myositis exhibit aspects of an acquired inflammatory protein-aggregate myopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".