Evidence of isochorismate channeling between the <i>Escherichia coli</i> enterobactin biosynthetic enzymes <scp>EntC</scp> and <scp>EntB</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
as a micronutrient. EntC and EntB are the first two enzymes in the enterobactin biosynthetic pathway. Isochorismate, produced by EntC, is a substrate for EntB isochorismatase. By using a competing isochorismate-consuming enzyme (the E. coli SEPHCHC synthase MenD), we found in a coupled assay that residual EntB isochorismatase activity decreased as a function of increasing MenD concentration. In the presence of excess MenD, EntB isochorismatase activity was observed to decrease by 84%, indicative of partial EntC-EntB channeling (16%) of isochorismate. Furthermore, addition of glycerol to the assay resulted in an increase of residual EntB isochorismatase activity to approximately 25% while in the presence of excess MenD. These experimental outcomes supported the existence of a substrate channeling surface identified in a previously reported protein-docking model of the EntC-EntB complex. Two positively charged EntB residues (K21 and R196) that were predicted to electrostatically guide negatively charged isochorismate between the EntC and EntB active sites were mutagenized to determine their effects on substrate channeling. The EntB variants K21D and R196D exhibited a near complete loss of isochorismatase activity, likely due to electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged isochorismate substrate. Variants K21A, R196A, and K21A/R196A retained partial EntB isochorismatase activity in the absence of EntC; in the presence of EntC, isochorismatase activity in all variants increased to near wild-type levels. The MenD competition assay of the variants revealed that while K21A channeled isochorismate as efficiently as wild-type EntB (~ 15%), the variants K21A/R196A and R196A exhibited an approximately 5-fold loss in observed channeling efficiency (~3%). Taken together, these results demonstrate that partial substrate channeling occurs between EntC and EntB via a leaky electrostatic tunnel formed upon dynamic EntC-EntB complex formation and that EntB R196 plays an essential role in isochorismate channeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".