MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400866534 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.154175

High cell density culture of microalgae in horizontal thin-layer algal reactor: Modeling of light attenuation and cell growth kinetics

2024· article· en· W4400866534 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongying Zhou, Ju Wang, Zisheng Zhang, Christopher Q. Lan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLight intensityAttenuationIntensity (physics)Growth rateOptical densityBiomass (ecology)KineticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOpticsChemistryMineralogyChromatographyBiologyEcologyPhysicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study delved into the light intensity effects and light attenuation modeling in high cell density culture (HCDC) of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans. The research primarily focused on how different light intensities influence cell growth in terms of cell division and cell mass, and the biochemical composition within the cells. Recognizing the need to avoid overestimating light path by excluding data point in the data zone where the light intensity was zero, we proposed and verified a novel modified Beer-Lambert model, which was superb in fitting experimental data and predicting light attenuation in both low and high cell density cultures. Taking advantage of the prediction power of the modified Beer-Lambert model, we devised an approach to maintain constant mean light intensity (Imean) and by adjusting the incident light intensity (I0). The results indicate that at an Imean of approximately 66.67 μmol/m2/s and 6 mm culture thickness, maximum volumetric and areal biomass productivities of 2.72 g/L/day and 16.32 g/m2/day, respectively, were achieved. Whereas the highest biomass concentration of 28.20 g/L was produced in 20 days at Imean 50 μmol/m2/s. Photoinhibition to cell division become evident at I0 750 μmol/m2/s and above. Using the data generated at constant Imean in the constant specific growth rate range, superb fitting to the Monod model with a R2 of 0.9910 was demonstrated, highlighting the importance of generating reliable data for the modelling of the kinetics of photoautotrophic growth of microalgae, which had considered to be challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering JournalSame topicAlgal biology and biofuel productionFrench-language works237,207