Reflection coefficient of a natural sodium bentonite in aqueous mixed electrolyte solutions: positive and negative anomalous osmosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A natural sodium bentonite was tested in the laboratory to measure its reflection coefficient, ω, in equilibrium with mixed aqueous solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl) and potassium chloride (KCl), with the aim of assessing the relative contribution of chemico-osmosis and diffusion induced electro-osmosis to the non-hydraulic component of the liquid flux in the presence of two cationic species, which diffuse at different rates in the pore solution. The former chemico-osmotic contribution is only related to the ionic partition effect in the bentonite pores, and causes ω to vary in the 0 to 1 range, whereas the latter electro-osmotic contribution is controlled by the diffusion potential, which spontaneously builds up across the bentonite layer in response to the different aqueous-phase diffusion coefficients of the ionic species. The theoretical interpretation of the obtained test results demonstrated that chemico-osmosis was the major contribution to ω when the testing solutions only comprised KCl. However, significant deviations in the values of ω from those expected for pure chemico-osmosis were observed for mixtures of NaCl and KCl, with both negative ( ω = −1.234) and positive ( ω = 1.040) anomalous values of the reflection coefficient, resulting from the enhanced influence of diffusion induced electro-osmosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".