MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401200560 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciae383

A Phase 3 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V116 in Pneumococcal Vaccine–Experienced Adults 50 Years of Age or Older (STRIDE-6)

2024· article· en· W4401200560 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T. Scott, Miwa Haranaka, Jung‐Hyun Choi, Helen Stacey, Marc Dionne, David Greenberg, Carlos G. Grijalva, Walter A. Orenstein, Doreen Fernsler, Nancy Gallagher, T Zeng, Jianing Li, Heather Platt, Timothy J. Chapman, Karyn Davis, Peter Dzongowski, Ginette Girard, Guy Tellier, Richard Tytus, S. Jaffuel, Jean‐François Nicolas, Eytan Ben Ami, Daniele Bendayan, Yoseph Caraco, Michal Chowers, Mahmud Darawsha, Avivit Peer, Francesco Bruno Blasi, Antonella Castagna, Claudio Costantino, Domenico Martinelli, Makoto Yono, Won Suk Choi, Dong‐Gun Lee, Jacob Lee, Hyejin Shi, Joon Young Song, Gustavo de Luíz Martinez, José María Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé, Cristina Masuet‐Aumatell, Silvia Narejos Pérez, Anna Vilella Morató, Kuo‐Chin Huang, Yi-Ching Yang, David Butuk, Jose Francisco Cardona, Nizar Daboul, Thomas Fiel, Neil J. Fraser, George Hartley Freeman, S Geller, Charles Harper, William Johnston, Thomas Lenzmeier, Enrique Pelayo, Laura Porterfield, Kathryn R. Rigonan, Jeffrey B. Rosen, Helen L Stacey

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMeso Scale Diagnostics
KeywordsMedicineImmunogenicityTolerabilityPneumococcal conjugate vaccineSerotypePneumococcal vaccinePneumococcal infectionsPneumococcal diseasePediatricsStreptococcus pneumoniaeImmunologyInternal medicineAdverse effectAntibodyMicrobiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal diseases cause considerable morbidity and mortality in adults. V116 is an investigational 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) specifically designed to protect adults from pneumococcal serotypes responsible for the majority of residual pneumococcal diseases. This phase 3 study evaluated safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V116 in pneumococcal vaccine-experienced adults aged ≥50 years. METHODS: A total of 717 adults were enrolled to receive a single dose of pneumococcal vaccine as follows: cohort 1 (n = 350) previously received 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and were randomized 2:1 to receive V116 or PCV15, respectively; cohort 2 (n = 261) previously received PCV13 and were randomized 2:1 to receive V116 or PPSV23, respectively; cohort 3 (n = 106) previously received PPSV23 + PCV13, PCV13 + PPSV23, PCV15 + PPSV23, or PCV15 and all received open-label V116. Immunogenicity was evaluated 30 days postvaccination using opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for all V116 serotypes. Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: V116 was immunogenic across all 3 cohorts as assessed by serotype-specific OPA GMTs and IgG GMCs postvaccination for all 21 serotypes. V116 elicited comparable immune responses to serotypes shared with PCV15 (cohort 1) or PPSV23 (cohort 2), and higher immune responses to serotypes unique to V116. The proportions of participants with solicited AEs were generally comparable across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: V116 is well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to currently licensed pneumococcal vaccines and generates IgG and functional immune responses to all V116 serotypes, regardless of prior pneumococcal vaccine received. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05420961; EudraCT 2021-006679-41.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207