MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401200574 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae143

Temozolomide use in elderly patients with MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma: Is it finally time to dismount a dead horse?

2024· letter· en· W4401200574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Uğur Sener, Erik P. Sulman, Jann N. Sarkaria

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideGlioblastomaHorseOncologyMedicineCancer researchBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temozolomide (TMZ) remains the only chemotherapy agent associated with a survival benefit in glioblastoma (GBM).In the landmark "Stupp" study, the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.6 months for patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) and TMZ compared to 12.1 months for patients treated with RT alone. 1 Epigenetic silencing via methylation within the CpG island of the promoter region of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene was associated with significantly improved outcomes in the RT/TMZ arm.Patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors treated with RT/TMZ had an mOS of 21.7 months as compared with 15.6 months for those treated with RT alone, while those with MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors had a marginal survival benefit (12.7 vs. 11.8 months, respectively; P = .06). 2 However, in this trial, 10% of patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors treated with RT/TMZ were alive at 3 years.Coupled with the mild toxicities and absence of compelling alternatives, these data have driven the routine use of TMZ in clinical practice regardless of MGMT status.Treatment of elderly and frail GBM patients represents a special clinical challenge where toxicity must be balanced with potential benefits.Due to poor tolerance of standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions) among elderly patients, hypofractionated RT (34 Gy in 3.4 fractions) was evaluated in the Nordic study, in which hypofractionated RT was associated with improved mOS compared to standard RT (7.0 vs. 5.2 months, respectively). 3TMZ alone compared to radiotherapy alone was studied among elderly patients in the German Neuro-oncology Working Group NOA-08 study.TMZ was noninferior to RT alone with an mOS of 8.6 versus 9.6 months, respectively. 4Combinatorial therapy was studied in the Canadian CE.6 study.mOS was longer with the addition of TMZ compared to hypofractionated RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions) alone (9.3 vs. 7.6 months, respectively), and patients with MGMT methylated tumors treated with TMZ had the greatest benefit (13.5 vs. 7.6 months). 5mOS also was modestly prolonged among patients with MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors who received TMZ (10.0 vs. 7.9 months).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207