MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401200574 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae143

Temozolomide use in elderly patients with MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma: Is it finally time to dismount a dead horse?

2024· letter· en· W4401200574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Uğur Sener, Erik P. Sulman, Jann N. Sarkaria

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideGlioblastomaHorseOncologyMedicineCancer researchBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temozolomide (TMZ) remains the only chemotherapy agent associated with a survival benefit in glioblastoma (GBM). In the landmark “Stupp” study, the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.6 months for patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) and TMZ compared to 12.1 months for patients treated with RT alone.1 Epigenetic silencing via methylation within the CpG island of the promoter region of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene was associated with significantly improved outcomes in the RT/TMZ arm. Patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors treated with RT/TMZ had an mOS of 21.7 months as compared with 15.6 months for those treated with RT alone, while those with MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors had a marginal survival benefit (12.7 vs. 11.8 months, respectively; P = .06).2 However, in this trial, 10% of patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors treated with RT/TMZ were alive at 3 years. Coupled with the mild toxicities and absence of compelling alternatives, these data have driven the routine use of TMZ in clinical practice regardless of MGMT status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207