Investigation of instability in the dynamic behaviour of a bubble
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In order to obtain the laws of the bubble's dynamic behaviours, the interFoam solver in OpenFOAM was used to simulate the bubbles, and the experimental device was built to prove the reliability of the results. The Eötvös number (Eo) and the Galileo number (Ga) were used to classify the bubbles into four regions according to their different dynamic behaviours: straight line without deformation region, slight zigzag without deformation region, zigzag with slight deformation region, and zigzag with strong deformation region. Eo of bubbles in the straight line without deformation region is extremely small and is greatly influenced by surface tension. The bubbles do not deform and rise linearly along the axis of symmetry. Eo of bubbles in the slight zigzag without deformation region is still small and the bubbles do not deform, but the path is curved for a period of time. As the value of Eo increases, the bubble in the zigzag with the slight deformation region is weakened. The path is a regular zigzag, and the axisymmetric structure of the bubbles is destroyed. In the zigzag with the strong deformation region, the values of Eo and Ga are large. The path amplitude increases and the periodic law is broken. The bubble's deformation and vortex shedding interact with each other, both of which are the causes of the bubble's path instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".