Human next-generation risk assessment of trichothecene toxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trichothecenes are naturally occurring chemicals, produced by fungi, that can be found in contaminated crops. Trichothecenes have the potential to indirectly damage DNA and exacerbate genotoxic effects of genotoxicants. However, genotoxicity data for most trichothecenes are limited and data gaps remain. Here we use the γH2AX/pH3 assay to evaluate DNA damage in vitro of 13 trichothecenes. Three human cell lines (SH-SY5Y, ACHN, and HepG2) were exposed to each trichothecene (0.001-100 μM) to assess toxicity as models for the brain, kidney, and liver, respectively. Concentration-dependent induction of DNA damage, illustrated by γH2AX induction, was observed for all trichothecenes. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) modeling was employed to support in vivo equivalent potency ranking and screen for risk potential. Diacetoxyscirpenol, T-2, and HT-2 had the highest genotoxic potency, notably in SH-SY5Y cells. Administered equivalent doses (AEDs) derived from IVIVE were compared against exposure data from French total diet studies to assess risk potential. AEDs derived for T-2 and HT-2 from the SH-SY5Y model were within 100-fold of exposure levels for infants aged one year or less. Overall, the potential for trichothecenes to damage DNA and higher exposures in infants highlights the need to investigate the cumulative effects across the broader trichothecene family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".