MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401504752 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202407-1320st

A Research Agenda to Improve Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

2024· article· en· W4401504752 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura C. Myers, Jennifer K Quint, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Nirupama Putcha, Alan Hamilton, Peter K. Lindenauer, J. Michael Wells, Leah J. Witt, Todd A. Lee, Huong Q. Nguyen, Caroline Gainer, Allan J. Walkey, David M. Mannino, Surya P. Bhatt, R. Graham Barr, Richard A. Mularski, Mark T. Dransfield, Sadiya S. Khan, Andrea S. Gershon, Miguel Divo, Valerie G. Press

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San FranciscoNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of California, San FranciscoHealth Resources and Services AdministrationCanadian Thoracic SocietyRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNational Institutes of HealthMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoBavarian NordicGenentechGrifolsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInsmedMedical Research CouncilTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiAstraZenecaSociety of Hospital MedicineEuropean Respiratory SocietyAmgenNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesMereo BioPharmaPfizerCOPD FoundationGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary diseaseCOPDDiseaseIntensive care medicineStatement (logic)Physical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often at risk for or have comorbid cardiovascular disease and are likely to die of cardiovascular-related causes. Objectives To prioritize a list of research topics related to the diagnosis and management of patients with COPD and comorbid cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, atherosclerotic vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation) by summarizing existing evidence and using consensus-based methods. Methods A literature search was performed. References were reviewed by committee co-chairs. An international, multidisciplinary committee, including a patient advocate, met virtually to review evidence and identify research topics. A modified Delphi approach was used to prioritize topics in real time on the basis of their potential for advancing the field. Measurements and Main Results Gaps spanned the translational science spectrum from basic science to implementation: 1) disease mechanisms; 2) epidemiology; 3) subphenotyping; 4) diagnosis and management; 5) clinical trials; 6) care delivery; 7) medication access, adherence, and side effects; 8) risk factor mitigation; 9) cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation; and 10) health equity. Seventeen experts participated, and quorum was achieved for all votes (>80%). Of 17 topics, ≥70% agreement was achieved for 12 topics after two rounds of voting. The range of summative Likert scores was −15 to 25. The highest priority was “Conduct pragmatic clinical trials with patient-centered outcomes that collect both pulmonary and cardiac data elements.” Health equity was identified as an important topic that should be embedded within all research. Conclusions We propose a prioritized research agenda with the purpose of stimulating high-impact research that will hopefully improve outcomes among people with COPD and cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.282
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.162
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2820.162
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0210.016
Open science0.0050.013
Research integrity0.0260.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→