Overall fairness perception and organizational citizenship behaviour: understanding the moderating and mediating factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Synthesizing theories of leadership, organizational fairness and organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). This study explores how overall organizational fairness affects OCB by considering the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem (OBSE) and the moderating role of authentic leadership. Design/methodology/approach In two phases, survey data were collected from 79 job incumbents at a financial company. Findings The findings suggest that authentic leadership significantly affects the relationship between overall fairness perceptions and OCB. Moreover, OBSE was found to act as a mediator in this relationship. Research limitations/implications Authentic leadership and organizational self-esteem play crucial roles in fostering a fair work environment that encourages employees to engage in citizenship behaviour. These findings underscore the importance of authentic leadership and OBSE in creating a fair work environment. These findings have implications for human resource management practices and leadership development programs. Originality/value Scholars in organizational behaviour have posited that fairness in the workplace is critical to facilitating effective leadership. However, more research is needed to investigate the interplay and mediating effects of fairness and leadership. The present study offers novel insights into the mediating mechanism of OBSE and its critical role in explaining the positive impact of overall fairness on employees’ OCB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".