MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401758435 · doi:10.1093/jtm/taae113

Streamlining malaria prevention recommendations for travellers: current and future approaches

2024· article· en· W4401758435 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah L. McGuinness, Olivia Veit, Martin Angelin, Pietro Antonini, Gerhard Boecken, Margarita Boering, Silja Bühler, Guido Calleri, Gilles Éperon, Gerard Flaherty, Céline M Gossner, Helena Hervius Askling, Ville Holmberg, Esther Kuenzli, Pierre Landry, Eva Lefevre, Michael Libman, Nicky Longley, Ula Maniewski-Kelner, Andreas Neumayr, C. Rapp, Alison Ridpath, Natalia Rodríguez-Valero, Anja Rosdahl, Deike Rosenbusch, Andrea Rossanese, Camilla Rothe, Patricia Schlagenhauf, Patrick Soentjens, Cornelia Staehelin, Jenny Visser, Leo G. Visser, Angelika Wagner, Allison Taylor Walker, Ursula Wiedermann, Agnieszka Wroczyńska, Christoph Hatz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Travel Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineMalariaTravel medicineMalaria preventionProtozoal diseaseVirologyIntensive care medicineEnvironmental healthImmunologyHealth servicesPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses challenges in formulating and harmonizing malaria prevention recommendations for travellers. It explores diverse approaches used by advisory groups to assess malaria risk and shares insights from the 2023 International Expert Committee for Travel Medicine meeting. It also explores future prospects for enhancing malaria prevention recommendations for travellers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.201
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.217
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2010.217
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0240.024
Open science0.0100.013
Research integrity0.0090.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Travel MedicineSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207