MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401869986 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciae437

PUNCH CD3-OLS: A Phase 3 Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (REBYOTA) in Adults With Recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection

2024· article· en· W4401869986 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Feuerstadt, Teena Chopra, W Knapple, Nicholas W. Van Hise, Erik R. Dubberke, Brian Baggott, Beth Guthmueller, Lindy Bancke, Michael Gamborg, Theodore S. Steiner, Daniel Van Handel, Sahil Khanna

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Infectious Diseases CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesFerring Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsClostridioidesMedicineFecal bacteriotherapyObservational studyFecesProspective cohort studyCohort studyInternal medicineClostridium difficileCohortMicrobiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL; REBYOTA)-the first single-dose, broad consortia microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults following standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotic treatment. METHODS: PUNCH CD3-OLS was a prospective, phase 3, open-label study, conducted across the US and Canada. Participants were aged ≥18 years with documented rCDI and confirmed use of SOC antibiotics. Participants with comorbidities including inflammatory bowel disease and mild-to-moderate immunocompromising conditions could be enrolled. A single dose of RBL was rectally administered within 24-72 hours of antibiotic completion. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with RBL- or administration-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included treatment success and sustained clinical response, at 8 weeks and 6 months after RBL administration, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 793 participants were enrolled, of whom 697 received RBL. TEAEs through 8 weeks after administration were reported by 47.3% of participants; most events were mild or moderate gastrointestinal disorders. Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.9% of participants. The treatment success rate at 8 weeks was 73.8%; in participants who achieved treatment success, the sustained clinical response rate at 6 months was 91.0%. Safety and efficacy rates were similar across demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: RBL was safe and efficacious in participants with rCDI and common comorbidities. This is the largest microbiota-based live biotherapeutic study to date, and findings support use of RBL to prevent rCDI in a broad patient population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03931941.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207