MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401875977 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-4024

Fitness Screens Map State-Specific Glioblastoma Stem Cell Vulnerabilities

2024· article· en· W4401875977 on OpenAlexafffund
Graham MacLeod, Fatemeh Molaei, Shahan Haider, Maira P. Almeida, Sichun Lin, Michelle Kushida, Haresh Sureshkumar, Jasmine K. Bhatti, Jack Q. Lu, Daniel Schramek, Peter B. Dirks, Stéphane Angers

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAmgen (Canada)Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyStem cellContext (archaeology)Cancer researchGenetic heterogeneityGeneGeneticsComputational biologyPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults and is driven by self-renewing glioblastoma stem cells (GSC) that persist after therapy and seed treatment-refractory recurrent tumors. GBM tumors display a high degree of intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity that is a prominent barrier to targeted treatment strategies. This heterogeneity extends to GSCs that exist on a gradient between two transcriptional states or subtypes termed developmental and injury response. Drug targets for each subtype are needed to effectively target GBM. To identify conserved and subtype-specific genetic dependencies across a large and heterogeneous panel of GSCs, we designed the GBM5K-targeted guide RNA library and performed fitness screens in a total of 30 patient-derived GSC cultures. The focused CRISPR screens identified the most conserved subtype-specific vulnerabilities in GSCs and elucidated the functional dependency gradient existing between the developmental and injury response states. Developmental-specific fitness genes were enriched for transcriptional regulators of neurodevelopment, whereas injury response-specific fitness genes were highlighted by several genes implicated in integrin and focal adhesion signaling. These context-specific vulnerabilities conferred differential sensitivity to inhibitors of β1 integrin, focal adhesion kinase, MEK, and OLIG2. Interestingly, the screens revealed that the subtype-specific signaling pathways drive differential cyclin D (CCND1 vs. CCND2) dependencies between subtypes. These data provide a biological insight and mechanistic understanding of GBM heterogeneity and point to opportunities for precision targeting of defined GBM and GSC subtypes to tackle heterogeneity. Significance: CRISPR-Cas9 screens in a panel of patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells reveal heterogeneity in genetic vulnerabilities across subtypes that have important implications for targeted and combination treatment strategies for glioblastoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207