Same‐Day Repeatability and 28‐Day Reproducibility of Xenon <scp>MRI</scp> Ventilation in Children With Cystic Fibrosis in a Multi‐Site Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MRI with xenon-129 gas (Xe MRI) can assess airflow obstruction and heterogeneity in lung diseases. Specifically, Xe MRI may represent a sensitive modality for future therapeutic trials of cystic fibrosis (CF) therapies. The reproducibility of Xe MRI has not yet been assessed in the context of a multi-site study. PURPOSE: To determine the same-day repeatability and 28-day reproducibility of Xe MRI in children with CF. STUDY TYPE: Four-center prospective, longitudinal. POPULATION: ) ≥85% predicted). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo (GRE) sequence. ASSESSMENT: ) were performed. To assess same-day reproducibility, Xe MRI was performed twice within the first visit, and procedures were repeated at 28 days. Xe hypoventilation was quantified using ventilation-defect percentage (VDP) and reader-defect volume (RDV). For VDP, hypoventilated voxels from segmented images were identified using a threshold of <60% mean whole-lung signal and expressed as a percentage of the lung volume. For RDV, hypoventilation was identified by two trained readers and expressed as a percentage. STATISTICAL TESTS: Inter-site comparisons were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests with Dunn's multiple-comparisons tests. Differences for individuals were assessed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests. Bland-Altman tests were used to evaluate same-day repeatability, 28-day reproducibility, and inter-reader agreement. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: was 6.6 (6.3-7.4). Xe MRI had high same-day reproducibility (mean VDP difference 0.12%, 95% limits of agreement [-3.2, 3.4]; mean RDV difference 0.42% [-2.5, 3.3]). At 28 days, 26/31 participants (84%) fell within the same-day 95% limits of agreement. DATA CONCLUSION: Xe MRI may offer excellent same-day and short-term reproducibility. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".