MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402636467 · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.006523

Taxonogenomic analysis of the Xanthomonas translucens complex leads to the descriptions of Xanthomonas cerealis sp. nov. and Xanthomonas graminis sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W4402636467 on OpenAlexafffund
James T. Tambong, Renlin Xu, María Constanza Fleitas

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaManitoba Crop AllianceWestern Grains Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyPathovarXanthomonasBotanyMicrobiologyAcanthaceaeStrain (injury)BacteriaGeneticsPseudomonadaceaePseudomonas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pathovar-based taxonomy of the Xanthomonas translucens group is very confusing due to an overlap of plant host ranges and level of host specificity. Here, whole-genome sequence-based parameters (digital DNA–DNA hybridization and blast-based average nucleotide identity), phylogenomic, biochemical and phenotypical data were used to taxonomically analyse the 11 known pathovars of the X. translucens complex. This polyphasic approach taxonomically assigned the 11 pathovars of X. translucens complex into three distinct species, two of which are new: X. translucens, X. cerealis sp. nov. and X. graminis sp. nov. X. translucens consists of three pathovars: pv. translucens (=pv. hordei), pv. pistaciae strain A ICMP 16316PT and pv. undulosa (=pv. secalis). X. cerealis sp. nov. encompasses the pv. cerealis strain LMG 679PT and pv. pistaciae strain B ICMP 16317PT with genome similarity of 92.7% (dDDH) and 99.0% (ANIb) suggesting taxonomically similar genotypes. The other new species, X. graminis sp. nov., consists of the remaining five designated pathovars (pv. graminis, pv. arrhenatheri, pv. poae, pv. phleipratensis and pv. phlei) with highly variable dDDH and ANIb values ranging from 74.5 to 93.0% and from 96.7 to 99.2%, respectively, an indication of a very divergent taxonomic group. Only strains of pvs. phlei and phleipratensis showed the highest genomic similarities of 93.0% (dDDH) and 99.2% (ANIb), suggesting synonymic pathovars as both infect the same plant hosts. The dDDH and ANI data were corroborated by phylogenomics clustering. The fatty acid contents were similar but the type strain of X. graminis sp. nov. exhibited 20% less C15 : 0 iso and 40% more C17 : 0 iso fatty acids than the other species. Based on phenotypic, biochemical and whole-genome sequence data, we propose two new species, Xanthomonas cerealis sp. nov. and Xanthomonas graminis sp. nov. with type strains LMG 679T (=NCPPB 1944T) and LMG 726T (=NCPPB 2700T), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGYSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207