MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402636467 · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.006523

Taxonogenomic analysis of the Xanthomonas translucens complex leads to the descriptions of Xanthomonas cerealis sp. nov. and Xanthomonas graminis sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W4402636467 on OpenAlexafffund
James T. Tambong, Renlin Xu, María Constanza Fleitas

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaManitoba Crop AllianceWestern Grains Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyPathovarXanthomonasBotanyMicrobiologyAcanthaceaeStrain (injury)BacteriaGeneticsPseudomonadaceaePseudomonas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pathovar-based taxonomy of the Xanthomonas translucens group is very confusing due to an overlap of plant host ranges and level of host specificity. Here, whole-genome sequence-based parameters (digital DNA–DNA hybridization and blast -based average nucleotide identity), phylogenomic, biochemical and phenotypical data were used to taxonomically analyse the 11 known pathovars of the X. translucens complex. This polyphasic approach taxonomically assigned the 11 pathovars of X. translucens complex into three distinct species, two of which are new: X. translucens , X. cerealis sp. nov. and X. graminis sp. nov. X. translucens consists of three pathovars: pv. translucens (=pv. hordei ), pv. pistaciae strain A ICMP 16316 PT and pv. undulosa (=pv. secalis ). X. cerealis sp. nov. encompasses the pv. cerealis strain LMG 679 PT and pv. pistaciae strain B ICMP 16317 PT with genome similarity of 92.7% (dDDH) and 99.0% (ANIb) suggesting taxonomically similar genotypes. The other new species, X. graminis sp. nov., consists of the remaining five designated pathovars (pv. graminis , pv. arrhenatheri, pv. poae , pv. phleipratensis and pv. phlei ) with highly variable dDDH and ANIb values ranging from 74.5 to 93.0% and from 96.7 to 99.2%, respectively, an indication of a very divergent taxonomic group. Only strains of pvs. phlei and phleipratensis showed the highest genomic similarities of 93.0% (dDDH) and 99.2% (ANIb), suggesting synonymic pathovars as both infect the same plant hosts. The dDDH and ANI data were corroborated by phylogenomics clustering. The fatty acid contents were similar but the type strain of X. graminis sp. nov. exhibited 20% less C 15 : 0 iso and 40% more C 17 : 0 iso fatty acids than the other species. Based on phenotypic, biochemical and whole-genome sequence data, we propose two new species, Xanthomonas cerealis sp. nov. and Xanthomonas graminis sp. nov. with type strains LMG 679 T (=NCPPB 1944 T ) and LMG 726 T (=NCPPB 2700 T ), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGYSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207