A Comprehensive Proteogenomic and Spatial Analysis of Innate and Acquired Resistance of Metastatic Melanoma to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma achieves durable responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, the majority ultimately exhibit either innate or acquired resistance to these treatments. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to ICB therapies remain elusive and are warranted to elucidate. Here, we comprehensively investigated the tumor and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of paired pre- and post-treatment tumor specimens from metastatic melanoma patients who were primary or secondary resistance to anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) with transcriptomic data identified cell cycle and c-MYC signaling as pathway-based resistance signatures. And weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) revealed the activation of a cross-resistance meta-program involving key signaling pathways related to tumor progression in ICB resistant melanoma. Moreover, spatially-resolved, image-based immune monitoring analysis by using NanoString's digital spatial profiling (DSP) and Cyclic Immunofluorescence (CyCIF) showed infiltration of suppressive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of melanoma with resistance to ICB therapies. Our study reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to ICB therapies in patients with metastatic melanoma by conducting such integrated analyses of multi-dimensional data, and provides rationale for salvage therapies that will potentially overcome resistance to ICB therapies. Statement of translational relevance: This study paves the way for the creation of innovative therapeutic strategies, aimed at subverting resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies in metastatic melanoma patients. By unraveling the specific molecular mechanisms underlying resistance, scientists can design effective alternative treatments that target pathways such as pathways associated with cell cycle dysregulation and c-MYC signaling. Furthermore, through the application of advanced immune monitoring techniques such as NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) and Cyclic Immunofluorescence (CyCIF), this study has significantly enriched our understanding of the tumor microenvironment. This enhanced characterization facilitates the discovery of potential biomarkers that may forecast a patient's response to ICB treatment. Ultimately, these advancements could potentially refine patient outcomes and foster the development of more personalized cancer treatments in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".