A tutorial review on solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals, materials, and applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
is used as a fuel. They use a highly efficient chemical-to-electrical energy conversion process to convert oxygen and hydrogen into electricity and water. They can provide smaller-scale power for transportation (e.g., cars, buses, and ships) and be scaled up to provide long-term energy for an electrical grid, making SOFCs a promising, clean alternative to hydrocarbon combustion. Conventional SOFCs faced challenges of high operating temperatures, high cost, and poor durability. Research into advanced cathode, anode, electrolyte, and interconnect materials is providing more insight into the ideal structural and chemical properties that enable the commercialization of highly stable and efficient intermediate temperature (IT) SOFCs. In this paper, we discuss the functional properties of the cathode, anode, electrolyte, and interconnectors for IT-SOFCs. The performance of SOFCs depends not only on the materials used but also on the optimization of operating conditions to maximize efficiency. The voltaic, thermodynamic, and fuel efficiency of SOFCs is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it