Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Cell Therapy Based on Osteoblasts Derived from Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Study Protocol for a Single-Center, Open-Label, Phase I Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) insertion has gained recent attention as a joint-preserving procedure, no study has conducted direct intralesional implantation of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUCMSCs) in patients with ONFH. This is a protocol for a phase 1 clinical trial designed to assess the safety and exploratory efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived osteoblasts (hUC-Os), osteogenic differentiation-induced cells from hUCMSCs, in patients with early-stage ONFH. Nine patients with Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage 1 or 2 will be assigned to a low-dose (1 × 107 hUC-O cells, n = 3), medium-dose (2 × 107 cells, n = 3), and high-dose group (4 × 107 cells, n = 3) in the order of their arrival at the facility, and, depending on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity, up to 18 patients can be enrolled by applying the 3 + 3 escalation method. We will perform hUC-O (CF-M801) transplantation combined with core decompression and follow-up for 12 weeks according to the study protocol. Safety will be determined through adverse event assessment, laboratory tests including a panel reactive antibody test, vital sign assessment, physical examination, and electrocardiogram. Efficacy will be explored through the change in pain visual analog scale, Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, ARCO stage, and also size and location of necrotic lesion according to Japanese Investigation Committee classification before and after the procedure. Joint preservation is important, particularly in younger, active patients with ONFH. Confirmation of the safety and efficacy of hUC-Os will lead to a further strategy to preserve joints for those suffering from ONFH and improve our current knowledge of cell therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".