The impact of Pangean subducted oceans on mantle dynamics: Passive piles and the positioning of deep mantle plumes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• We present global mantle convection models with and without dense mantle heterogeneities near the core-mantle boundary. • We compare the locations of our model deep mantle plumes with available geophysical and geological data. • Our model results illustrate the power of sinking ocean plates to stir mantle flow and control the it’s thermal evolution. Seismic imaging of the Earth’s interior reveals plumes originating from relatively hot regions of the lowermost mantle, surrounded by cooler material thought to be remnants of ancient subducted oceans. Currently, there is no clear consensus on the internal composition of the hot regions, with end-member conditions being that they are thermo-chemical in nature or purely thermal plume clusters. Previous modelling studies have shown a range of scenarios where deep chemical heterogenities or purely thermal anomalies are essential in developing appropriate present-day mantle dynamics. Here, we add to this discussion by quantifying the location of rising mantle plumes using numerical 3-D global mantle convection models constrained by 410 million years of palaeo-ocean evolution (encompassing the formation and breakup of supercontinent Pangea). Our study compares numerical simulations with purely thermal convection to those where a deep thermo-chemical anomaly is laterally mobile. The results show that models both with and without large-scale chemical heterogeneities can generate appropriate present-day plume dynamics, which illustrate the power of sinking ocean plates to stir mantle ow and control the thermal evolution of the mantle. Our models add to the discussion on bottom-up and top-down mantle dynamics, indicating the difficulty in unravelling the processes using numerical models alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".