MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1370 Single Ascending Dose Results From a Phase 1 Clinical Trial of BT-600, a Combination Product of the NaviCap Targeted Oral Delivery Platform and Tofacitinib

2024· article· en· W4403722036 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, Ghesal Razag, A. Fabiyi, Shaoying N. Lee, Gregory Armaos, Paul Shabram, Sharat Shingh, Ariella Kelman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsCelerion (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTofacitinibClinical trialInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The NaviCap platform uses an oral drug delivery capsule that autonomously identifies locations in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for anatomically targeted delivery (Figure 1). The device is designed to deliver a liquid drug formulation directly to the colon mucosa, bypassing the upper GI tract. In patients with ulcerative colitis, delivery to the colon could improve efficacy and reduce toxicity with lower systemic drug exposure. Results of device function studies without drug have previously been reported. Here we report interim results of the Phase 1 clinical trial of BT-600, a drug-device combination of NaviCap with a liquid formulation of tofacitinib. Methods: This Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose (SAD/MAD) clinical trial evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BT-600 in healthy adult participants. In Part 1, participants (n=24) received a single dose of BT-600 with tofacitinib 5 mg (n=9), 10 mg (n=9), or placebo (n=6). Part 2 (n=24) will assess safety, plasma, and colonic tissue exposure of BT-600 or placebo daily for 7 days. A pre-specified interim analysis included results on safety, plasma PK, and evidence of drug in feces in Part 1. Results: Adverse events were mild, transient, and consistent with those expected in a healthy population. All 24 participants demonstrated systemic absorption following a single dose, with PK parameters consistent with colonic delivery, in distinction to delivery in the upper GI tract. Tofacitinib was first detected in plasma at ∼6 hours following administration of BT-600. The median time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was 8–10 hours vs 0.5–1.0 hours for conventional oral tofacitinib. Colonic delivery of BT-600 was associated with 3–4x lower systemic absorption of tofacitinib vs conventional oral tofacitinib, with plasma tofacitinib Cmax arithmetic mean (SD) values of 26 (14.8) ng/mL for BT-600 at the 10 mg dose (Table 1). Drug was present in fecal samples of all participants. Overall AUCs and peak (Cmax) exposures to plasma tofacitinib increased in a dose proportional manner from BT-600 5 mg to 10 mg. Conclusion: Interim results of the Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy adult participants showed that BT-600 was well tolerated and achieved colonic drug delivery with lower systemic exposure than seen with conventional oral tofacitinib.Figure 1.: The NaviCap device. Table 1. - Plasma tofacitinib pharmacokinetic parameters following administration of a single oral dose of 5 mg or 10 mg BT-600 in healthy participants (PK Population) BT-600 5 mg (n=9) BT-600 10 mg (n=9) Xeljanz 10mg† AUC0-last (ng.hr/mL) 123 (37) 257 (133) 283 (80) AUC0-inf (ng.hr/mL) 128 (35) 266 (132) 289 (81) Cmax (ng/mL) 14 (4.2) 26 (14.8) 88 (10.2) Tmax (hours) 8 (6–16) 10 (6–16) 0.5 (0.25–1.0) t½ (hours) 4.9 (1.59) 7.8 (3.24) 2.61 (0.633) Mean (SD) shown for all parameters, except Tmax, where median and range are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207