MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403722358 · doi:10.1109/td48022.2026.11562712

A Fast and Setting-Less Breaker Failure Backup Protection Scheme for Multi-Terminal HVDC Grids

2024· article· en· W4403722358 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Radwan, Sahar Pirooz Azad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCircuit breakerBackupTerminal (telecommunication)Distribution boardScheme (mathematics)Power-system protectionReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringFuse (electrical)EngineeringComputer scienceElectric power systemTelecommunicationsPower (physics)PhysicsMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breaker failure backup protection schemes are essential for the reliable operation of high voltage direct current (HVDC) grids and to prevent damages to power system equipment due to sustained faults. This paper proposes a rapid, reliable, and setting-less breaker failure backup protection scheme for multi-terminal HVDC grids. The proposed scheme employs Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) to extract two features from local voltage measurements, namely the instantaneous frequency and energy. Based on detected outliers in the extracted instantaneous features, breaker failure events are rapidly detected. The proposed setting-less outlier-based criterion can be applied to HVDC grids with various configurations, parameters, and breaker technologies. The proposed scheme depends only on local voltage measurements to detect breaker failure events within <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{1} \, \text{ms} $</tex-math></inline-formula> from the intended breaker trip time without requiring breaker voltage or current measurements. In addition, the proposed scheme can successfully detect breaker failure events during high-resistance faults (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1500 \, \Omega$</tex-math></inline-formula>) and in grids with small boundary reactors (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{10} \, \text{mH} $</tex-math></inline-formula>). Numerous simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC software environment for a four-terminal HVDC grid are executed to demonstrate the rapid and reliable performance of the proposed breaker failure backup protection scheme under severe fault conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207