Extracranial systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation: an individual patient-level meta-analysis of 71 683 patients randomized to NOAC vs warfarin from the COMBINE-AF study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) poses a significant risk for both ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE). While the effectiveness of NOAC in preventing ischemic stroke is well-established, there is a lack of detailed analyses specifically characterizing SEE, which constitutes 5- 10% of all embolic events. Purpose To study the clinical characteristics, procedural management, and outcomes by randomized treatment (NOAC vs warfarin) of patients with SEE. Methods Using the COMBINE AF dataset, we conducted an individual patient level meta-analysis of 4 global RCTs (RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) of warfarin vs. NOAC in AF to assess risks of SEE. Outcomes were analyzed as time-to-first-event using a Cox proportional hazards model. Two authors independently reviewed deaths within 30 days after SEE to identify fatal SEE. Moreover, we independently assessed post SEE procedures to determined relatedness to SEE. Results There were 188 total SEEs, 9 patients (5%) had SEE then developed ischemic stroke; 16 patients (9%) had ischemic stroke then developed SEE; 1 patient had SEE and ischemic stroke simultaneously. Among the 171 patients with SEEs as first event, the median (IQR) age was 75 (68-80) years, 49.7% were female, median (IQR) of BMI was 27.5 (23.5-30.7) kg/m2, mean (SD) of CHADS2-VASC score was 4.7 (1.5). As compared with ischemic stroke (n=1789), SEE patients were more likely to have, PAD (16.5% vs. 5.4%, p <0.001), prior MI (24% vs. 17%, p = 0.02), be Vitamin K Antagonist experienced (57% vs 46%; p=0.007), have worse renal function (median CrCl mL/min; 58 vs 62, p = 0.02) and less likely to have paroxysmal AF (14% vs. 20%, p = 0.05). Of the total of 188 SEEs, 33 (18%) were fatal, 62 (31%) patients underwent surgical or percutaneous intervention (Fig). Standard dose (SD) NOAC significantly reduced the risk of SEE by 29% (95% CI 1-49%, p=0.04) compared with warfarin, However, no significant difference in the risk of SEE was observed between low dose (LD) NOAC and warfarin (Fig). Conclusion Standard dose NOAC was superior to warfarin in preventing SEE in AF patients. This benefit trends to be more pronounced for fatal cases. While SEE were about 1/10th as frequent as ischemic stroke in patients with AF, they were associated with significant morbidity and mortality and often required surgical or percutaneous intervention to restore blood flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.037 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".