MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rationale and design of the SHASTA-3 and SHASTA-4 studies: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of plozasiran in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia

2024· article· en· W4403822422 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Gaudet, Robert S. Rosenson, Robert A. Hegele, Stephen J. Nicholls, Karen Modesto, Rong Fu, Ma'An Muhsin, Jennifer Hellawell, Christie M. Ballantyne

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypertriglyceridemiaPlaceboRandomized controlled trialDouble blindInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathologyTriglyceride

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) confers an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and acute pancreatitis (AP). sHTG-associated AP is a substantial source of morbidity, mortality, reduced quality of life and financial burden to health care systems. Currently available therapeutic approaches for sHTG are often insufficient to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels and prevent AP. Plozasiran, an investigational siRNA therapeutic, inhibits hepatic production of apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3), a key regulator of lipoprotein lipase-mediated TG metabolism and clearance. In a phase 2 study of sHTG patients [TG ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L)], plozasiran demonstrated durable reductions in TG levels of up to -80%, 12 weeks after the last dose, and decreased TG below 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L), a threshold of increased risk for AP in most participants. The SHASTA-3 and SHASTA-4 trials will evaluate safety and efficacy of plozasiran, including AP rates, in patients with sHTG. SHASTA-3 and SHASTA-4 are phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trials. Key inclusion criteria are prior sHTG and fasting TG ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L), at screening. Key exclusion criteria include use of any hepatocyte targeted siRNA treatments that target lipids and/or TGs within 1 year (except inclisiran at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment), siRNA or ASO within 60 days, known FCS diagnosis, and AP within 4 weeks of screening. 700 adults with sHTG will be enrolled in these two trials in several sites across multiple countries. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive 4 quarterly subcutaneous injections of plozasiran 25 mg or matching placebo over a 1-year double-blinded period, followed by post-treatment evaluation or entry into the open-label extension study. The randomization will be stratified based on TG levels (≥880 mg/dL vs <880 mg/dL [≥ vs <10 mmol/L]) and prior history of AP, within 5 years of screening. The primary efficacy endpoint of the studies is placebo-adjusted percent change in fasting TG from baseline to month 12 with plozasiran. Secondary endpoints include percent change in fasting TG from baseline to month 10 compared to placebo, percent of patients achieving fasting TGs of <500 mg/dL (<5.65 mmol/L) and TGs of <150 mg/dL (<1.69 mmol/L) at month 10 and 12 compared to placebo, and event rate of adjudicated abdominal clinical events including ER visits and hospitalization for abdominal pain attributed to HTG and events of documented pancreatitis. The effect of plozasiran on other lipids and lipoproteins, inflammatory biomarkers, and liver fat content using magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction will be assessed. Adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event rates, safety and tolerability will be assessed. SHASTA-3 and SHASTA-4 are designed to determine whether the quarterly-dosed APOC3 siRNA plozasiran, added to standard of care, safely reduces TG levels and the rate of AP in patients with sHTG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.086
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0860.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207