Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new type of morphological expressive linguistic means and the corresponding linguistic sign are described: metasemy 1 — an expressive linguistic means that is an operation on the signified of the target lexeme; and metasemy 2 — a sign whose signifier is a metasemy 1 . Thus, the English metasemy 2 painting , when applied to a human proper name, such as, e.g., T urner , produces a derived lexeme, in this case, painting ( T urner) = [ a ] Turner ‘[a] painting by Turner’ ( I have seen two excellent Turners ). A formal description of the Russian metasemy 2 pomeščenie ‘place 2 ’ is presented, based on the analysis of the Russian phrase u otca ‘at father’s’ = ‘at father’s place 2 ’, where the underlying lexeme otec ‘father’ and the derived lexeme pomeščenie (otec) are involved, the meaning ‘place 2 ’ being expressed by the metasemy 2 pomeščenie . The English and French translational equivalents of this phrase, Eng. at father’s and Fr. chez le père , are shown to have different organizations: in at father’s , the meaning ‘place 2 ’ is carried by the ’s -form, and in chez le père , by the preposition chez . A tentative list of known Russian metasemies 2 is supplied, as well as the similar lists for English and French. A metasemy 2 always expresses a metonymic semantic relation between the underlying lexeme and the resulting derived lexeme; it is a derivational morphological means, parallel to derivational affixes. Metasemy 2 seems to exist universally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it