MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404029243 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.04.621834

F2,6BP restores mitochondrial genome integrity in Huntington’s Disease

2024· preprint· en· W4404029243 on OpenAlexafffund
Anirban Chakraborty, Santi M. Mandal, Mikita Mankevich, Sravan Gopalkrishnashetty Sreenivasmurthy, Balaji Krishnan, Muralidhar L. Hegde, Gourisankar Ghosh, Tapas K. Hazra

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsMitochondrial DNADiseaseBusinessGenomeMitochondrionNatural resource economicsBiologyCell biologyMedicineGeneticsEconomicsInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Several reports have indicated that impaired mitochondrial function contributes to the development and progression of Huntington’s disease (HD). Mitochondrial genome damage, particularly DNA strand breaks, is a potential cause for its compromised functionality. Here we show that the activity of polynucleotide kinase 3’-phosphatase (PNKP), a critical DNA end-processing enzyme, is significantly decreased in the mitochondrial extract of HD patients’ brains due to a lower level of fructose-2,6 bisphosphate (F2,6BP), a biosynthetic product of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3). Such decrease in PNKP activity leads to persistent DNA strand breaks that are refractory to subsequent steps for repair completion. Both PFKFB3 and F2,6BP, an allosteric modulator of glycolysis, are also present in the mitochondria and PFKFB3 is part of a mitochondrial DNA repair complex containing HTT, PNKP, DNA Pol γ (POLG) and Lig IIIα. Notably, PNKP binds F2,6BP (Kd= 525±25 nM) and utilizes it as a cofactor. The levels of both F2,6BP and PFKFB3 are significantly decreased in the mitochondrial extract of HD mouse striatal neuronal cells and patients’ brain. Activity of PNKP is thus severely decreased in the mitochondrial extract; however, addition of F2,6BP restored its activity. Moreover, supplementation of F2,6BP in HD cells restored PFKFB3 level, mitochondrial genome integrity and partially restored mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial respiration and prevented pathogenic aggregate formation. We also observed that supplementation with F2,6BP restored mitochondrial genome integrity in an HD Drosophila model. Our findings, therefore, suggest that F2,6BP-mediated restoration of PNKP activity could have a profound impact in ameliorating neurodegenerative symptoms in HD. Significance We reported earlier the loss of PNKP activity in the nuclear extracts from HD patients’ brain. However, a glycolytic metabolite, F2,6BP, can restore PNKP activity and rescue organismal phenotypes in HD fly models. As PNKP is present in mitochondria and several reports indicate that mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to HD, we therefore analyzed PNKP activity in the mitochondrial extract. Surprisingly, we found that PFKFB3 and its product, F2,6BP are present in mitochondria, but significantly low in patients’ brains. Exogenous addition of F2,6BP restored PNKP activity in patients’ brain mitochondrial extract. Moreover, supplementing F2,6BP in HD cells and fruit flies restored mitochondrial genome integrity suggesting maintaining adequate intracellular F2,6BP levels is critical for proper functionality of PNKP and thereby of brain health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→