617 Combined histone deacetylase and PD-L1 inhibition is safe and efficacious for the treatment of virus-associated cancers: results of a phase II clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> Valproate (VPA) is an orally available histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor and avelumab is a therapeutic anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. VPA is known to arrest the growth of transformed cells and has also been shown to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in virus-associated solid tumors (VAST) by increasing lytic viral gene expression. We hypothesized that combining VPA with avelumab may be an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with VAST. <h3>Methods</h3> We designed a single-arm, basket phase II feasibility trial. Patients with EBER+ nasopharyngeal (n=12) or p16+ oropharyngeal (8), cervical (7), anal (6), penile (3) or vaginal (2) carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received oral VPA (target serum concentration ug/mL) with avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously until progression of disease, or a maximum of two years’ duration. Objective response rate (ORR) was a co-primary endpoint with feasibility while safety, progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) were secondary outcomes under study. <h3>Results</h3> 39 patients were enrolled. Treatment was feasible; of 39 patients just two did not complete the pre-defined threshold of four treatment cycles. Approximately one-half of patients received first-line (metastatic) treatment, the remainder of patients had received ≥1 line(s) of therapy at the time of enrolment. ORR by RECIST 1.1 was 21% across the entire cohort; of interest, two of three patients with penile cancer achieved a sustained, partial response. Treatment responses were seen in all patient cohorts, except those with vaginal squamous cell carcinoma. All observed treatment responses have been durable in nature. For the all-patient analysis, median PFS and OS were 6.9 and 21.7 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed with PD-(L)1 blockade. We identified novel predictive biomarkers; the expression of galectin-9 on peripheral monocytes negatively correlated with efficacy, and increased serum IL8/IL18 and CD71+ erythrocyte precursor cells also predicted poor treatment outcomes. <h3>Conclusions</h3> We report feasibility, efficacy and safety results of a completed phase II trial combining HDAC and PD-L1 inhibition. Encouragingly, despite enrolling patients with prior therapy ORR were similar in this trial to those seen historically in untreated patients, and no new safety concerns were identified by combining HDAC inhibition with PD-L1 blockade. Ongoing biomarker analyses may be helpful in identifying patients for whom combination therapy could be considered. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Alberta Cancer Foundation, as well as EMD Serono. Most importantly, the authors wish to thank the patients and their families who participated in this clinical trial. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> This clinical trial was registered with the National Institute of Health (NIH); clinical trial registration number NCT03357757. <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> This clinical trial was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta (HREBA) Cancer Committee (approval number HREBA.CC-17-0374).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".