Synthesis and Evaluation of Fluorinated Piperazine‐Hydroxyethylamine Analogues as Potential Antiplasmodial Candidates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this manuscript, twenty‐one novel fluorinated piperazine‐hydroxyethylamine analogues were synthesized and tested against Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Among tested compounds, two 13 g and 14 g exhibited promising inhibitory activity on Pf3D7 with IC50 values of 0.28 and 0.09 μM, respectively. Neither of the hits exhibited cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells up to 150 μM and Vero cells up to 20 μM. Compounds 13 g and 14 g were also evaluated against chloroquine‐resistant PfDd2 and displayed IC50 values of 0.11 and 0.10 μM, respectively. Next, 13 g and 14 g were administered to the Plasmodium berghei mice model at 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally for four consecutive doses, which showed 25 % and 50 % reduction in the parasitemia load, respectively. The efficacy of hits 13 g and 14 g was improved along with mean survival time when administered in combination with artesunate. On liver‐stage parasites, compounds 13 g and 14 g showed >80 % inhibition at 1 μM. Compound 14 g was also tested for toxicity in mice at 100 mg/kg dose, which revealed no abnormality in mice organs. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies of compound 14 g exhibited absorption and maintained a presence in the body for more than six hours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".