MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404230831 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0411

CTNI-44. NCT03643549 PHASE IB/II TRIAL: EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF OBJECTIVE RESPONSES IN RECURRENT GBM PATIENTS WITH UNMETHYLATED MGMT PROMOTER TREATED WITH SEQUENTIAL BORTEZOMIB AND TEMOZOLOMIDE

2024· article· en· W4404230831 on OpenAlexaff
Dorota Goplen, Mohummad Aminur Rahman, Jorunn Brekke, Surendra Kumar, Victoria Smith Arnesen, Even Birkeland, Anne Simonsen, Andreas Waha, Kirstin Marienhagen, Leif Oltedal, Judit Haász, Hrvoje Miletić, Frode Selheim, Tora S. Solheim, Petter Brandal, Stein Atle Lie, Martha Chekenya

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideBortezomibMedicineOncologyPhases of clinical researchInternal medicineGlioblastomaCancer researchPharmacologyClinical trialMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is amongst the deadliest malignancies in adults, but especially for patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter (uMGMT) who gain limited benefit from the standard treatment. We previously demonstrated that proteosome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ), inhibited NFkB activation,depleted MGMT protein and sensitized uMGMT GBM cells to Temozolomide (TMZ). Thus, a phase I/II trial testing sequential combination BTZ+TMZ was launched to investigate safety and clinical benefit. METHODS Recurrent GBM patients with uMGMT promoter, progressing ≥12 weeks after radiotherapy, KPS≥70 and radiologically measurable lesions were enrolled. The trial was powered for n=63 patients compared with n=102 historical controls. Patients received BTZ 1.3mg/m² IV on days 1, 4, and 7 of each 4-week cycle, starting on day 3 with oral 200mg/m² TMZ for 5 days/week. Whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor DNA was conducted to identify genetic changes and LC-MS/MS used to asses proteomic changes in plasma collected during treatment. RESULTS As of January 2024, 54 patients (median 55y (25-70); 38 males, 16 females) were treated. The median KPS 90 (range 70-100) and NANO score was 1 (range 0-7). QoL was preserved, with mild /moderate adverse events. Adjusted analyses showed overall survival (OS) of 16.2 months compared to 8.4 months for uMGMT control patients, HR0.48, 95%CI[1.057-2.74],P=0.028. Objective radiological responses stable disease or better were observed in 22% (12/54) patients. Survival from recruitment was 10.5 months for responders vs. 4.8 months for rest of cohort, P=0.054 HR2.55, 95%CI[0.984-5.94]. Preliminary data indicate 78% (7/9) of responders harboured amplified EGFR vs. 38% in rest-of-the patients. The responders differentially expressed proteins critical for cellular processes, including ADAMTSL4, NCAM1, AZGP1, MMP2, CD163, and IL6ST. CONCLUSION Sequential BTZ+TMZ therapy is safe, effective and showed clinical benefit. EGFR amplification may be a predictive biomarker for response through NFκB activation, that is targeted by BTZ thereby depleting MGMT protein and enhancing treatment efficacy. Sequential BTZ+TMZ treamtment may represent additional treatment option at recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207