MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404237307 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0406

CTNI-39. UPDATE ON GBM AGILE: A GLOBAL, PHASE 2/3 ADAPTIVE PLATFORM TRIAL TO EVALUATE MULTIPLE REGIMENS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED AND RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

2024· article· en· W4404237307 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew B. Lassman, Brian M. Alexander, Donald A. Berry, Nicholas Berry, Meredith Buxton, Howard Colman, Hui Gan, John de Groot, Macarena de la Fuente, Jan Drappatz, François Ducray, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Gary Gordon, Emma Maria Viktoria Hyddmark, A. Peter Johnson, Mustafa Khasraw, E. Lee, Michael Lim, Anna McGlothlin, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Tom Mikkelsen, Phioanh L. Nghiemphu, James Perry, Ashley A. Powell, Erik P. Sulman, Sarah Untch, Michael Weller, Patrick Y. Wen, Antje Wick, Alfred Yung, Timothy F. Cloughesy

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlioblastomaAgile software developmentMedicineComputer scienceOncologyInternal medicineCancer researchSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND GBM AGILE (Glioblastoma Adaptive, Global, Innovative Learning Environment) is a biomarker based, multi-arm, international, seamless Phase 2/3 platform trial designed to rapidly identify and confirm experimental therapies that improve overall survival for approval along with their associated biomarker signatures. GBM AGILE is a collaboration between academic investigators, patient organizations, and industry to support new drug applications for newly diagnosed (ND) and recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS The primary objective of GBM AGILE is to identify therapies that improve the overall survival in patients with ND or recurrent glioblastoma. Bayesian response adaptive randomization is used within subtypes of the disease to assign participants to investigational arms based on their performance. GBM AGILE operates under a Master Protocol allowing multiple drugs to be evaluated simultaneously and over time against a common control. New experimental therapies are added as information about promising new drugs is identified, while therapies are removed as they complete evaluation. Six investigational arms have been included to date. Along with an adaptive trial design, shared control arm and operational processes, GBM AGILE continues to incorporate new design and operational elements. One recent design element added to the Master Protocol for consideration for future arms is an extended evaluation period, of up to 11 months, for arms that reach maximum sample size in Stage 1 (Stage 1: learn most responsive signature) without having reached a decision for futility or graduation. Allowing data to mature and additional events to accumulate may increase the ability of the trial to detect efficacy, and if appropriate, for an arm to graduate to Stage 2 (Stage 2: confirm activity in graduating signature). Using improved and flexible processes, GBM AGILE continues to serve as a global trial that supports the efficient and rapid incorporation and evaluation of new experimental therapies for patients with glioblastoma. NCT number: NCT03970447.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207