MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404237499 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1079

RTID-03. A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FOCUSED-ULTRASOUND-MEDIATED BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER DISRUPTION PLUS SYSTEMIC PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH NSCLC BRAIN METASTASES (LIMITLESS)

2024· article· en· W4404237499 on OpenAlexaff
Manmeet S. Ahluwalia, Ahmad Ozair, Kamal Sahni, Nader Sanai, Arjun Sahgal, Michael McDermott, Kingsley Nwaogu, Graeme F. Woodworth, Nir Lipsman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineOncologyBlood–brain barrierCancerImmunotherapyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Systemic therapy for brain metastases (BM) is hindered by blood-brain barrier (BBB). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), combined with IV microbubble oscillators, leads to non-invasive BBB disruption, which could enhance intracranial delivery of systemic immune checkpoint inhibitors. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of LIFU-mediated BBB disruption plus systemic pembrolizumab for NSCLC BM. METHODS LIMITLESS (NCT05317858) is an ongoing, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label RCT that randomizes NSCLC BM patients on standard-of-care pembrolizumab monotherapy to LIFU plus pembrolizumab (arm 1) or pembrolizumab alone (arm 2) in a 2:1 ratio. Included patients have age ≥18 years, normal organ function, KPS ≥70, EGFR- and ALK-negative primary tumor, and ≤3 BM with ≥1 BM meeting RANO-BM measurable disease criteria. All patients receive standard-of-care therapy, while those on arm 1 undergo LIFU before each pembrolizumab dose (200mg IV q3weeks). Patients undergo pre-treatment brain MRI, followed by IV microbubbles for enhanced sonication effects. MR-guided BBB disruption is performed using transcranial 220kHz LIFU device with real-time acoustic-feedback-based power control for maintaining effective microbubble activation. Pembrolizumab is infused immediately after sonication, and repeat MRI is done 24-48 hours later to assess treatment effects. Primary study outcome is overall objective response rate (ORR) at 6 months as assessed using RANO-BM. Using Bayesian design for power analysis, a superior ORR of 60% is assumed for LIFU arm versus 30% for control arm for total sample size of N=96 (64 participants in LIFU and 32 in control arm), for 80% power using two-sided chi-square test with alpha=0.05. For upper-bound estimate, ORR of 45% in LIFU arm and 30% in control arm, the study needs N=369 participants (246 in LIFU arm and 123 in control arm). Secondary outcomes are best ORR and median time-to-response. Exploratory outcomes are median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), median intracranial PFS, median extracranial PFS, and quality of life. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022 and remains ongoing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207