MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4139196: Long-term effectiveness and safety of mavacamten in a real-world, multi-center, global study: Preliminary results of COLLIGO-HCM from a diverse cohort in the United States

2024· article· en· W4404246252 on OpenAlexaff
James P. MacNamara, Arnon Adler, Elad Maor, Rachel Bastiaenen, Matthew Gold, Ervant Maksabedian Hernandez, Xu Han, Patricia Schuler, Joel A Salazar, Paula Orlandi, Leanne Li, Angel Pichardo, Ozlem Bilen

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCenter (category theory)CohortTerm (time)Medical emergencyGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The mavaCamten ObservationaL evIdence Global cOnsortium in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (COLLIGO-HCM; ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06372457) is a multinational, multicenter observational research initiative aiming to describe the real-world outcomes of mavacamten for the treatment of obstructive HCM. Aims: Describe the real-world effectiveness and safety of mavacamten, measured by echo measurements and NYHA class. Methods: This retrospective study used data from medical records from two participating HCM centers in the US. Patient-level data was extracted to assess the effectiveness and safety of mavacamten post-treatment initiation through 60 weeks. Patient characteristics and outcomes were described, including echocardiogram measurements, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and safety. Results: A total of 93 patients were treated with mavacamten (mean age 60.6 ± 13.9 years, 23.7% black, 57.0% female, and 77.4% NYHA class III at baseline) with a mean follow-up of 37.0 ± 28.1 weeks ( Table ). From baseline to week 60, 3 (3.2%) patients experienced temporary treatment discontinuation, and 3 (3.2%) discontinued mavacamten due to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. By week 12, 77.1% of patients had improved by ≥1 NYHA class. The percentage increased to 89.5% by week 24 and remained stable through week 60. Mean changes from baseline in resting and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 31.8 ± 32.8 and 57.3 ± 47.3 mmHg, respectively, at week 24, and remained similar through week 60. Mean change in LVEF from baseline was 4.1 ± 7.1% at week 12 and remained largely unchanged through week 60 (Figure) . Conclusions: This study demonstrated the early and sustained effectiveness of mavacamten with one of the longest follow-ups to date, in a real-world population with a higher racial diversity and disease burden than those in the clinical trials. This data further substantiates the effectiveness and safety profile of mavacamten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsFrench-language works237,207