MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4116714: Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor as a Causal Metabolic Mediator of Cardiovascular Disease: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2024· article· en· W4404324405 on OpenAlexaff
Sukrit Narula, Michael Chong, Marie Pigeyre, Nicolas Perrot, Salim Yusuf, Guillaume Paré

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNuclear Receptors and Signaling
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationMedicineObservational studyDiseaseMediatorRisk factorInternal medicineRandomizationRandomized controlled trialGerontologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Macrophage biology plays a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and circulating macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a marker of macrophage activity. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding its role as a mediator of cardiovascular disease. Methods: We evaluated the association between plasma M-CSF concentration with myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure and mortality in a large substudy involving 9992 participants drawn from 14 countries and followed for a median period of 9.8 years (Interquartile Range 8.9 years - 11.4 years) utilizing a nested case-cohort design in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. We then conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the upstream determinants (using genome wide association data from the PURE biobank and publicly available consortia) and downstream effects on clinical events.. Results: The strongest causal upstream determinant of M-CSF concentration was body mass index (BMI), which showed a positive association with plasma M-CSF concentration (Beta: 0.17 SD increase; 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.27). In a survival analysis, M-CSF was independently associated with increased incident myocardial infarction (HR: 1.25 per 1 SD M-CSF increase; 95% CI: 1.13-1.38), stroke (HR: 1.17; 95% CI:1.04-1.32), and heart failure (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.15-1.56) and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. Circulating M-CSF concentration also showed a strong association with long-term risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.39-1.60). Mendelian randomization analyses confirmed that increased M-CSF was associated with increased risk of MI, heart failure, and ischemic stroke (specifically large artery atherosclerotic and cardioembolic stroke). Conclusions: M-CSF is a strong causal driver of cardiovascular disease morbidity whose concentration is causally influenced by body mass index. Our analysis suggests a role for macrophage activity in mediating the relationship between body mass index and cardiovascular disease outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicNuclear Receptors and SignalingFrench-language works237,207