MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404455231 · doi:10.25251/skin.8.supp.437

Bimekizumab 4-year Maintenance of Responses in Week 16 Responders with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT Open-label Extension Phase 3 Trial

2024· article· en· W4404455231 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Blauvelt, Peter Foley, Richard G. Langley, Curdin Conrad, David Rosmarin, Ricardo Romiti, Maggie Haitian Wang, Balint Szilagyi, Bengt Hoepken, Richard B. Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersSchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityUniversidade de São PauloManchester Biomedical Research CentreDalhousie UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPlaque psoriasisOpen labelPsoriasisMedicineInternal medicineDermatologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic disease where loss of response to biologic therapies over time is commonly observed; studying long-term efficacy of new treatments is important.1 Maintenance of high responses to bimekizumab (BKZ) has been reported through 3 years (yrs) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.2 This study evaluates the maintenance of clinical responses over 4 years among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who achieved complete or near-complete skin clearance after 16 weeks (wks) of BKZ treatment and entered the BE BRIGHT open-label extension. Responses were compared over 4 years between all patients who were randomized to BKZ and continued to receive bimekizumab (320 mg every 4 wks [Q4W] or Q8W) in the open-label extension, and those who received the BKZ dosing regimen that is approved for most patients: BKZ 320 mg Q4W to Wk 16 followed by 320 mg Q8W. Methods: Patients completing the 52-wk BE VIVID or 56-wk BE SURE/BE READY phase 3 trials could enter the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (OLE).2–5 Maintenance of PASI90/PASI100 (≥90%/100% improvements from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) to Yr4 (OLE Wk144) was assessed in Wk16 responders. Analyzed patients were randomized to BKZ 320 mg Q4W to Wk16, received BKZ Q4W or Q8W until OLE entry, then BKZ Q4W or Q8W dependent on PASI response/prior dose (BKZ Total); the subset who received BKZ Q4W/Q8W/Q8W (initial/maintenance/OLE) were also analyzed. All received BKZ Q8W from OLE Wk48 or at their next scheduled visit. Patients who discontinued due to lack of efficacy/treatment-related adverse events were considered non-responders; multiple imputation was used for all other missing data (modified non-responder imputation). Results: Of 989 BKZ-randomized patients, 87.5% achieved PASI90 and 62.7% PASI100 at Wk16 (non-responder imputation). 693 Wk16 PASI90 and 503 PASI100 responders entered the OLE (BKZ Total); 186 and 147, respectively, received BKZ Q4W/Q8W/Q8W. 87.7%/73.3% of Wk16 PASI90/PASI100 responders maintained their responses to Yr4 (BKZ Total). In the Q4W/Q8W/Q8W subset, 89.0%/76.7% maintained their responses to Yr4. Conclusions: Among Wk16 responders, high efficacy responses were sustained through 4 yrs of BKZ treatment, including patients who received the approved Q4W/Q8W/Q8W dosing regimen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207