MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404641117 · doi:10.1515/cppm-2024-0062

Modeling the kinetics, energy consumption and shrinkage of avocado pear pulp during drying in a microwave assisted dryer

2024· article· en· W4404641117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Product and Process Modeling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrinkagePulp (tooth)Thermal diffusivityPEARPulp and paper industryWater contentMaterials scienceMoistureComposite materialChemistryHorticultureThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Drying kinetics, energy utilization (EU) and shrinkage level of avocado pear pulp during drying were investigated and modeled to determine the condition that enhances the quality of the dried product. Drying was carried out using a microwave assisted dryer with data lodger. The system was set at a constant power of 200 W, air velocity of 1.4 m/s, and temperatures of 50, 60 and 70 °C with pulp thickness being 5 mm. Fifteen thin-layer drying models, five non-linear shrinkage models and ANN methods were tested for describing the drying behaviour of avocado pulp using statistical parameters. The results revealed that drying took place in the falling rate period with the above temperatures reducing the moisture content of the pulp from 64.12 to 2.16 % wet basis within 15,360, 11,520 and 5,130 s, respectively. The drying rate and effective diffusivity increased with increase in temperature and ranged from 6.05 × 10 −3 to 1.70 × 10 −2 kg/kgs and 3.11 to 9.34 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, respectively. The activation energy of the pulp was 50.34 kJ/mol. Among the drying models tested, Page and Aghashilo models provided the best statistical parameters for describing the drying behaviour of the pulp, while ANN demonstrated great ability to predict MR and SR more accurately with high and low R 2 and RMSE. A non-linear shrinkage model developed also had the best fit qualities for describing the shrinkage behaviour of the pulp. The energy utilized (EU) , specific energy utilized (S EU ) , heat transfer coefficient (h tc ) and mass transfer coefficient (M tc ) of the pulp ranged from 7.36 to 3.19 kWh, 11.21 to 5.76 × 10 −2 Wh/kg, 0.1054 to 7.98 × 10 −7 W/mK and 2.06 to 4.28 × 10 −6 m/s respectively and were statistically (5 %) influenced by temperature. The EU model developed had the best description behaviour of the energy relationship with other factors, having high R 2 and low RMSE and SSE values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it