Generation of Monosomy 21q Human <scp>iPS</scp> Cells by <scp>CRISPR</scp> /Cas9‐Mediated Interstitial Megabase Deletion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Missing an entire chromosome or chromosome arm in normal diploid cells has a deleterious impact on cell viability, which may contribute to the development of specific birth defects. Nevertheless, the effects of chromosome loss in human cells have remained unexplored due to the lack of suitable model systems. Here, we developed an efficient, selection-free approach to generate partial monosomy in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The introduction of Cas9 proteins and a pair of gRNAs induces over megabase-sized interstitial chromosomal deletions. Using human chromosome 21 (HSA21) as a model, partial monosomy 21q (PM21q) iPSC lines with deletions ranging from 4.5 to 27.9 Mb were isolated. A 33.6 Mb deletion, encompassing all protein-coding genes on 21q, was also achieved, establishing the first 21q monosomy human iPSC line. Transcriptome and proteome analyses revealed that the abundances of mRNA and protein encoded by the majority of genes in the monosomic regions are half of the diploid expression level, indicating an absence of dosage compensation. The ability to generate customized partial monosomy cell lines on an isogenic, karyotypically normal background should facilitate the gain of novel insights into the impact of chromosome loss on cellular fitness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".