Tracking the gene expression programs and clonal relationships that underlie mast, myeloid, and T lineage specification from stem cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T cells develop from hematopoietic progenitors in the thymus and protect against pathogens and cancer. However, the emergence of human T cell-competent blood progenitors and their subsequent specification to the T lineage have been challenging to capture in real time. Here, we leveraged a pluripotent stem cell differentiation system to understand the transcriptional dynamics and cell fate restriction events that underlie this critical developmental process. Time-resolved single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that downregulation of the multipotent hematopoietic program, upregulation of >90 lineage-associated transcription factors, and cell-cycle exit all occur within a highly coordinated developmental window. Gene-regulatory network inference uncovered a role for YBX1 in T lineage specification. We mapped the differentiation cell fate hierarchy using transcribed lineage barcoding and discovered that mast and myeloid potential bifurcate from each other early in hematopoiesis, upstream of T lineage restriction. Our systems-level analyses provide a quantitative, time-resolved model of human T cell fate specification. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".