MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404857469 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdae173.035

10311- ACT-19 A GLOBAL, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF VORASIDENIB VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH ADULT-TYPE DIFFUSE GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1/2 MUTATION (INDIGO): UPDATED EFFICACY RESULTS

2024· article· en· W4404857469 on OpenAlex
Martin J. van den Bent, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Mehdi Touat, Deborah T. Blumenthal, Katherine B. Peters, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Joe Mendez, Shlomit Yust‐Katz, Warren Mason, Andreas F. Hottinger, Yoshiki Arakawa, Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez, Wolfgang Wick, Adriana E. Tron, Dan Zhao, Shuchi S. Pandya, Lori Steelman, Islam Hassan, Patrick Y. Wen, Timothy F. Cloughesy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergServierMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity of UtahTel Aviv UniversitySorbonne UniversitéDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumHuntsman Cancer Institute
KeywordsPlaceboGliomaIDH1Double blindedMedicineInternal medicineMutationOncologyBiologyGeneticsCancer researchPathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901) evaluated vorasidenib, an oral,brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (mIDH1/2), in patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (BIRC), and key secondary endpoint of time to next intervention (TTNI), were met in the positive, preplanned second interim analysis (IA2). The study was unblinded in March 2023 following independent data monitoring committee recommendation. Herein, we present results after an additional 6 months of follow-up between the database lock for IA2 (September 6, 2022) and study unblinding (March 7, 2023). METHODS Patients with residual/recurrent grade 2 mIDH1/2 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma were enrolled (aged ≥12 years; Karnofsky Performance Status, ≥80; measurable non-enhancing disease; surgery as only prior treatment; no immediate need of chemoradiotherapy). Patients were randomized 1:1 to vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily in 28-day cycles. RESULTS Overall, 331 patients were randomized (median age, 40.0 years; oligodendroglioma, 172; astrocytoma, 159). As of March 7, 2023, 123/168 (73%) patients remained on vorasidenib and 72/163 (44%) remained on placebo. PFS per BIRC remained in favor of vorasidenib (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25–0.49) and was consistent with PFS per investigator assessment (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.50). Median PFS per BIRC: vorasidenib, not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 22.1–NE); placebo, 11.4 months (95% CI, 11.1–13.9). TTNI also remained in favor of vorasidenib (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.16–0.40). Median TTNI: vorasidenib, NE (95% CI, NE–NE); placebo, 20.1 months (95% CI, 17.5–27.1). No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSIONS Vorasidenib is a targeted therapy for patients with predominantly non-enhancing mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma following surgical intervention, as shown in the INDIGO population. These additional 6 months of follow-up confirm the previously reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and TTNI with vorasidenib.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it