Domain‐Shuffling in the Evolution of Cyclostomes and Gnathostomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertebrates acquired various novel traits that were pivotal in their morphological evolution. Domain shuffling, rearrangements of functional domains between genes, is a key molecular mechanism in deuterostome evolution. However, comprehensive studies focusing on early vertebrates are lacking. With advancements in genomic studies, the genomes of early vertebrate groups and cyclostomes are now accessible, enabling detailed comparative analysis while considering the timing of gene acquisition during evolution. Here, we compared 22 metazoans, including four cyclostomes, to identify genes containing novel domain architectures acquired via domain-shuffling (DSO-Gs), in the common ancestor of vertebrates, gnathostomes, and cyclostomes. We found that DSO-Gs in the common ancestor of vertebrates were associated with novel vertebrate characteristics and those in the common ancestor of gnathostomes correlated with gnathostome-specific traits. Notably, several DSO-Gs acquired in common ancestors of vertebrates have been linked to myelination, a distinct characteristic of gnathostomes. Additionally, in situ hybridization revealed specific expression patterns for the three vertebrate DSO-Gs in cyclostomes, supporting their potential functions. Our findings highlight the significance of DSO-Gs in the emergence of novel traits in the common ancestors of vertebrates, gnathostomes, and cyclostomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".