MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405054118 · doi:10.7202/1114775ar

« <i>De sur a norte</i> » : traduire la posture <i>ch’ixi </i>de Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui vers l’anglais

2024· article· fr· W4405054118 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ana Kancepolsky Teichmann

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtDecolonizationPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2019, dix ans après sa publication originale en espagnol, apparaît le premier livre traduit vers l’anglais de l’activiste, théoricienne, historienne et sociologue bolivienne Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui : Ch’ixinakax utxiwa. On Practices and Discourses of Decolonization (Polity Press). Le contexte de cette traduction est problématique : alors que, dans son texte, Rivera Cusicanqui adresse une forte critique aux théories et théoricien·nes de la décolonisation issu·es des universités nord-américaines, ce sont ces mêmes universités qui la traduisent quelques années plus tard. Cet article propose une analyse de la posture (Meizoz, 2009) de Rivera Cusicanqui qui se développe à partir du concept aymara ch’ixi, une couleur grise constituée d’un noir et d’un blanc qui ne se mélangent pas. L’étude de quelques extraits de Ch’ixinakax utxiwa. On Practices and Discourses of Decolonization servira à démontrer que la posture auctoriale est transformée dans le processus traductif, où certains de ses traits sont effacés ou nuancés, et que ces transformations sont indissociables du contexte de production de la traduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTTR traduction terminologie rédactionSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207