MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405103398 · doi:10.1111/tpj.17199

An independent biosynthetic route to frame a xanthanolide‐type sesquiterpene lactone in Asteraceae

2024· article· en· W4405103398 on OpenAlexaff
Changfu Li, Yuanjun Li, Fenghe Lu, Lifen Zheng, Lu Yang, Wenwen Sun, Dae‐Kyun Ro, Xudong Qu, Yihan Wu, Yansheng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSesquiterpeneSesquiterpene lactoneLactoneGermacreneStereochemistryAsteraceaeBiosynthesisRing (chemistry)ChemistryBiologyBiochemistryBotanyOrganic chemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xanthanolides, also described as seco-guaianolides, are unique sesquiterpene lactones (STLs) with diverse bioactivities. Most of xanthanolides are 12,8-olides based on the position of their lactone ring. The biosynthetic pathway leading to xanthanolides has hitherto been elusive, especially how nature creates the xanthane skeleton is a long-standing question. This study reports the elucidation of a complete biosynthetic pathway to the important 12,8-xanthanolide 8-epi-xanthatin. The xanthane-type backbone is directly derived from the central precursor germacrene-type sesquiterpene, germacrene A acid, via oxidative rearrangement, catalyzed by an unusual cytochrome P450. Subsequently, a 12,8-lactone ring is formed within this xanthane-type backbone resulting in xanthanolides. The biosynthetic pathway for xanthanolides contrasts with the previously unified biosynthetic route for diverse 12,6-guaianolides, in which a 12,6-lactone ring formation precedes the transformation of a germacrene-type skeleton into a guaiane-type structure. The discovery of the full biosynthetic pathway of 8-epi-xanthantin opens new opportunities for producing xanthanolides in microbial organisms using synthetic biology strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant JournalSame topicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesFrench-language works237,207